Your direct supplier on solar inverter, solar controller, solar battery , solar panel, solar lamp and solar systems. Welcome you invest our new factory and work together!
Hello,Welcome!  Login  Register      sitemaps | Board | My Orders | My Wellsee
Hot search: Solar inverter | voltage inverter | charger inverter | sine wave inverter | off-grid inverter | solar controller | MPPT | solar panel | charge controller | solar regulator
Your Position: > Knowledge >> wind turbine >>> vertical axis wind turbines and horizontal axis wind turbine

vertical axis wind turbines and horizontal axis wind turbine

cindy / 2015-01-13
[B] [M] [S]

 In the wind turbine business there are basically two types of turbines to choose from, vertical axis wind turbines and horizontal axis wind turbines. They both have their advantages and disadvantages and the purpose of this article is to help you choose the right system for your application.

Horizontal axis wind turbine dominate the majority of the wind industry. Horizontal axis means the rotating axis of the wind turbine is horizontal, or parallel with the ground. In big wind application, horizontal axis wind turbines are almost all you will ever see. However, in small wind and residential wind applications, vertical axis turbines have their place. The advantage of horizontal wind is that it is able to produce more electricity from a given amount of wind. So if you are trying to produce as much wind as possible at all times, horizontal axis is likely the choice for you. The disadvantage of horizontal axis however is that it is generally heavier and it does not produce well in turbulent winds.

Horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) command the small wind turbine (SWT) market, led by a handful of companies that have been in production for 20 to 30 years, while vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) manufacturers, with the exception of Ropatec (Bolzano, Italy), have mostly developed within the past five years. VAWTs have posted high growth and proliferated quickly, but according to Getting real about small wind, published in February 2010 at renewableenergyfocus.com by turbine manufacturer Ampair’s managing director David Sharman, they nevertheless account for only 2 to 3 percent of overall units.
HAWTs overwhelmingly use three blades, though there are several models with two or five blades. By contrast, VAWT configurations and blade shapes vary quite a bit, but most feature two, three or five vertical blades. The majority of VAWTs are some form of Savonius (drag-type) or Darrieus (lift-type) configuration, or a combination of the two.

In comes the vertical axis wind turbine. With vertical axis wind turbines the rotational axis of the turbine stands vertical or perpendicular to the ground. As mentioned above, vertical axis turbines are primarily used in small wind projects and residential applications. This niche comes from the OEM’s claims of a vertical axis turbines ability to produce well in tumultuous wind conditions. Vertical axis turbines are powered by wind coming from all 360 degrees, and even some turbines are powered when the wind blows from top to bottom. Because of this versatility, vertical axis wind turbines are thought to be ideal for installations where wind conditions are not consistent, or due to public ordinances the turbine cannot be placed high enough to benefit from steady wind.

VAWTs have several advantages. They are omnidirectional, that is, they do not change orientation to match the wind direction as HAWTs must do. This reduces the number of parts. Almost all VAWTs feature a direct drive (they require no gearbox between the rotor and the generator). This significantly reduces operating costs while increasing durability and reliability. VAWTs are reportedly much more efficient in turbulence, enabling rooftop and urban installations, and they turn at comparatively lower revolutions per minute, thus producing less vibration and noise. Most VAWT manufacturers quote noise levels of less than 40 dB at a distance of less than 20 ft/6m, while the few HAWT builders that offer such measurements often report 50 to 60 dB or more at much greater distances. VAWTs are typically more compact and operate at lower elevations, making them less visually intrusive.

However, VAWTs might have issues, some say, with reliable self-start in low wind speeds and also with less efficient power production than HAWTs (the low rotation speeds are quiet but not necessarily efficient). This issue is discussed in a paper by Jacken Chen, founder and general manager of Hi-VAWT Technology Corp., a Taiwan-based manufacturer of a combined Savonius/Darrieus VAWT. The Savonius unit provides a more reliable self-start, but the Darrieus components provide efficient power. Meanwhile, other sources claim that simply modifying Darrieus designs via optimal turbine sizing and higher-performance blade shapes will do the same.

That aside, skeptics argue that the poor quality of wind at lower heights and in urban/suburban settings is a technical barrier that VAWTs will never overcome. Small wind commentator Mike Sagrillo cites two examples in his experience: a 6-kW vertical turbine that, when installed on a government building for $51,000, produced only 400 kW-hr in 10 months (the payback was calculated as 890 years) and a $40,000 VAWT that generated only 41 kW-hr in seven months (with a payback of 4,761 years).

And yet, according to Ropatec project manager Alessandro Bortolotti, the real issue is proper planning and siting. His company has installed roughly 1,000 VAWTs, and in Bortolotti’s experience, “the main problem is that people think you can put a turbine on a building and automatically you will have more wind, but that is not true.” He explains that “it is necessary to measure wind speed and direction for at least 6 months on a 6m [20-ft] pole.” Having completed many rooftop installations, Ropatec advises, “The turbine must also be situated in the main wind direction and be mounted on a mast at least 6m in height to avoid turbulence created by the building itself.”

Nick Sassow, COO of recent VAWT startup SEaB Energy Ltd. (Southampton, U.K.), points out that the total cost to be considered in calculating payback is not just unit purchase and installation, but it also includes cost of maintenance and downtime for repairs. HAWTs have a higher number of service points, including pitch and yaw controls and bearings, and access becomes increasingly time- and cost-intensive with installation height. Also, for some turbines and maintenance problems, a technician may be required at a not trivial hourly rate. Thus, downtime and maintenance costs can significantly alter the total time in operation, output and payback.
Anyway, both VAWT and HAWT belongs to green energy and that contributes to environment protection. Consumers can decide the type according to their requirement. Wuhan Wellsee is a reliable brand for small scale wind turbine, customers who need can buy from them.

User Comment

No comment
Username: Anonymous user
E-mail:
Rank:
Content:
Verification code: captcha

View History

vedio center products center Honor Knowledge Outstanding Articles
Bluelight History  |  About Us  |  Honor  |  Knowledge  |  Feedback  |  Service  |  Company profile  |  Contact Us

© 2005-2017 Wellsee solar supply Copyright, All Rights Reserved.
Wuhan Wellsee New Energy. Block D, Zhongli Enterprise Building, No. 92, Wuhan Boulevard, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Tel: 0086-13986203125,13986203097,13971182531 E-mail: sales@e-bluelight.com,admin@e-bluelight.com
skype:Cindy
cindywellseeCindy cindywellsee  skype:Doris
doriswellseeDoris doriswellsee  skype:Tracy
tracywellseeTracy tracywellsee  skype:Owen
sarawellseeOwen sarawellsee
Run 116 queries, spents 0.152394 seconds, 59 people online,Gzip enabled,take up memory 3.836 MB